Build GDBM vs ES state verification tooling #164
Labels
No labels
Blocked
Duplicate
MoSCoW/Could Have
MoSCoW/Must Have
MoSCoW/Should Have
Points/1
Points/13
Points/2
Points/21
Points/3
Points/5
Points/8
Priority/Backlog
Priority/Critical
Priority/High
Priority/Low
Priority/Medium
State/Completed
State/In progress
State/In review
State/Paused
State/Unverified
State/Verified
State/Wont Do
Type/Bug
Type/Epic
Type/Feature
Type/Legendary
Type/Task
Type/Testing
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Blocks
Depends on
#162 Epic: Phase 2 — Dual Primary Write Mode
aethyr/Aethyr
#166 Implement ProjectionReadModel query layer
aethyr/Aethyr
Reference: aethyr/Aethyr#164
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Metadata
feat(event-sourcing): build verification tool to compare GDBM and ES statefeature/m2-es-verificationBackground and Context
Before transitioning to Phase 3 (ES as primary read source), we need confidence that GDBM and ES contain the same data. A verification tool loads all objects from GDBM and checks each against the ES aggregate/projection state, reporting discrepancies.
Acceptance Criteria
SequentSetup.verify_consistencycompares all GDBM objects against ESaethyr_setupas a new menu optionaverifytriggers verification from in-gameSubtasks
SequentSetup.verify_consistencymethodaethyr_setupmenuaverifyadmin command with handler and actionbundle exec rake unit, fix any failurestests/integration/verifying verification tooling detects intentional state divergence between GDBM and ES.bundle exec rake unit_profileand verify no performance regressions.bundle exec rake unit. If coverage is <97% then review the current unit test coverage report atbuild/tests/unit/coverage/and use it to write new Cucumber based unit tests to improve code coverage. Specifically, write Cucumber/Gherkin style unit tests that are descriptively named and specifically improve coverage on whichever file has the most uncovered lines by writing tests that will target the uncovered lines in the report. Once that is done rerunbundle exec rake unitto verify all tests pass and coverage is above >=97%. Only mark this as complete once coverage is >=97%, if not repeat this task as many times as is needed until coverage reaches >=97%.bundle exec rake(default task: unit tests with coverage) andbundle exec rake integration, fix any errors if needed ensuring both pass across entire code base, do not ignore any failure even if it seems unrelated to this commit, fix it.Definition of Done
This issue is complete when:
master, reviewed, and merged before this issue is marked done.